Onorato, Corbett go toe to toe on TV

October 26, 2010

Kari Andren

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/10/onorato_corbett_go_toe_to_toe.html

Have Onorato and Corbett Gone Soft?

The Gubernatorial Race Democratic Dan Onorato and Tom Corbett make it appear as though they are playing “nice” while campaigning compared to the Senate Race. Does this mean a clearer judgment of the better governor candidates can be determined among the voters?

 This in no means indicates that Onorato and Corbett haven’t tried to put a negative light on each other.  On the contrary, both candidates have each spent hundreds of thousands of their campaign funding on TV commercials and aids.  For Corbett, paying double the amount of paid-off because afterward Corbett led over Onorato.  Although Onorato attacked “…across-the-board budget cuts…” proposed by Corbett, saying it would significantly hurt senior citizens.  And yet again Corbett ran an aid using Onorato’s words to damage Onorato’s creditability when it came to job increase in Allegheny.

            More time than none the aid run by candidate have little truth in them.  Commercials, used to diminish the opponents judgment or character, consists of quotes and policies obscured and twisted to present themselves, the candidate as a positive figure, being the “good guy.”  I believe that for the most part voters should not base their candidate decisions upon aids and commercials. These are not reliable sources. Voters should research on the candidate’s policies and tune into debates to get a better idea of whom they should, in fact, vote for. 

PA 2010 Mid-Term Election Breakdown: Dan Onorato, Tom Corbett, Pat Toomey, and Joe Sestak

October 27, 2010

Sean OBrien

http://www.philly2philly.com/politics_community/politics_community_articles/2010/10/27/45410/pa_2010_mid_term_election_breakdown_

Onorato vs. Corbett & Sestak vs. Toomey on Hot Tpoics

            Now that Pa Election Day is not far away at all, there are some pretty good prospects of where the major candidates from both the Governor and Senator. By now does the public, a.k.a. the voters, know how enough about the candidates make a well thought about choice? Who will is for the time-being most likely prevail and win the election?

            From the Gubernatorial Race, Dan Onorato is representing the Democratic Party while the Republicans are represented by Tom Corbett.  Onorato had a seat on City Council in Pittsburgh, and later became controller of Allegheny. He is now currently Executive of Allegheny.  Corbett has been Allegheny’s Assistant District Attorney, Shaler Township’s Commissioner, and Western Pa’s U.S. Attorney. Currently he is now Attorney General of Pa.

            During public debates topics like gun control regulations, taxes and funding were hot topics.  Onorato’s stance on these issues is gun control is regulations should be in place and that stat’s such as Florida should not be excused for the regulation, lower corporate income tax, decrease Pa legislature, and to cuts on school funding.  Also related to schooling, Onorato believes that awarding grants to low income student so that they can attend their choice of school is a good future idea. Corbett on the other hand, has established a gun violence task force, also wants taxes lowered, favors government and small business interaction, intends to down right, “…cut the legislative per diem…”, wants s decrease of fleet vehicles from the government along with money towards a children’s school of choice.  Both candidates strongly support the Early Childhood education and school tax credit program. Both Onorato and Corbett acknowledge the growth potential and environmental concerns of the Marcellus Shale rock formation but each have a different approach for its funding. 

            In the Senate Race, the major candidates are Democrat Joe Sestak and Republican Pat Tommey.  While in the Navy Sestak was Vice Admiral, U.S. Director of Defense, and Navy Director and afterward was elected into the 7^th District’s House of Representatives. Toomey was Government Study Commission for Allentown, and then he was also elected into the 15^th District’s House of Representatives.

            For the Senate debates touches on a variety of different issues. Sestak said that there was an excessive of cuts made in the Pentagon, he is against nuclear weapons in Iran, increase troops in Afghanistan, he favors like many the Early Childhood education, and he wants to change Social Security to ensure its future.  Toomey doesn’t agree on the end of the war in Afghanistan, “…privatizing Social Security…”, and abortion supported by taxpayers.

            Sean Obrien, the author of the article, seems to just be very straight forward and factual with his statements.  There is no display of his support of one candidate over another. These facts are useful for voters to establish a basic outline of the important topics and issues of where each major candidates, from both the Gubernatorial Face and the Senate Race, stands.

Joe Sestak Making Play For Second Turn As Comeback Kid

October 19, 2010
Sam Stein
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/19/joe-sestak-comeback_n_768051.html

Is Joe Sestak the new comeback kid?

            It has been rumored that democrat Joe Sestak will make a significant comeback in the pa senate fall election.
            Sestak leads 46% to 45% for the first time in the poll from PPP and the ABC News odd makers now say that the race went from "lean republican to toss up". A new found hope was given to the Democratic Party and also felt that a repetition of Senator Arlen Spector come back might just happen for Sestak. Although Sestak is more stable in the campaign financially than republican opponent pat Toomey, the debate issues have been the same. Now Sestak has started to point out Toomey's faults more pronouncedly that it has affected Sestak's campaign in a positive way.

U.S. Senate candidates Pat Toomey and Joe Sestak exchange attacks

October 15, 2010
Ivey Dejesus
http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/10/us_senate_candidates_pat_toome.html

Crunch Time Means Attack Mode

      As the Fall Senate Election quickly approaches it is crunch time for candidates, Republican Pat Toomey and Democrat Joe Sestak. Both Toomey and Sestak had used this time to cleverly attack the others campaign to score some last minute or swing voters. The senate candidates are both aggressive and are focusing on "economic and tax policies and congressional records" to put the other in a bad light. Will their attempts prove to be effective?  What will voters think of the candidates once they see that Toomey and Sestak have gone far and beyond to attack one another?
With a debate on Wednesday in Philly and one on Friday in Pittsburgh it seems as though Sestak had a pretty confident lead. This however is not entirely true according to recent polls which display more or close lead. Toomey although has a 10% lead with likely voters, reported by Rasmussen.
       Voters got a view of both candidates attended a conference call to a group of workers. Sestak tried to reach out to working people, while meeting with small companies like Hydroworx. Sestak tries to establish the idea to "change the focus of Washington... in favor of small business and jobs." Sestak also spoke about job loss and his future ideas to improve the situation. He rectifies his support of stimulus bill, Criticized by Toomey, by saying it supposed to be a "a slow hemorrhaging of jobs bill." Sestak took a risky move and pointed out that his own party didn’t support all of his proposals to display his determination “to be an independent reprehensive of pa working families. He attacked Toomey by saying "Toomey's economic and foreign trade policies" is supporting job outsourcing which will led to loss of jobs especially in pa. Sestak also criticized Toomey on his support of trade policies in china. Toomey then talked about campaign finance regulations. Both candidates where then asked their views on the " don’t ask, don’t tell policy" which restricts homosexuals from openly serving. Both candidates said they would repeal the policy; Toomey is very open to it and Sestak is disappointed repeal hasn’t occurred sooner already.
      Both candidates used political attacks instead of resorting to personal attacks which helps make more creditable campaign. Sestak seems to relate to matters that everyday people would understand and be attentive to. Toomey even though talked about political issues it would help to speak about topics the everyday voters would care significantly for. I believe that this conference call benefited Sestak more than Toomey.

Toomey, Sestak trade jabs on housing

October 15. 2010

Chris Brennan

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/pennsylvania/20101014_Toomey_rips_Sestak_on_housing.html

Sestak and Toomey Pointing the Finger

            It is a game of placing the blame in the Pennsylvania 2010 Senate Election. Both Pat Toomey and Joe Sestak are passing the blame on each other for the housing collapse resulting in the downfall of national economy. Will this be the beginning to an ugly campaign and debate? Can both Toomey and Sestak hold their composure after an attack by their opponent?

Realizing its crunch time until general election on November 2^nd Toomey has come to campaign on Philadelphia.  His speech mainly focused on putting down Frannie and Freddie Mac and Sestak saying that it is their fault for the housing problem.  Frannie and Freddie Mac are two "government-sponsored enterprises… with the mission to increase the amount of money banks can lend to homebuyers” who was supposed to be a solution to reduce financial spenders.  Toomey think ending relations with these agencies and conducting a study of in fact how they potentially affect the economy and banks.  Toomey also blamed Sestak for being a sell-out to taxpayer who had a “liberal agenda” in mind.

Sestak responded to Toomey’s statement and accusations by indicating Toomey’s agreement of a legislation in support of the agencies Frannie and Freddie Mac.  Sestak also pointed out that fact that Toomey had not make up his mind on the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act which would prevent new economic trouble from mortgages.  Sestak’s spokesman’s talked about how Toomey only points the finger, never examining his own faults and short coming or realizing his dependence on Wall Street.

Toomey’s response was that the act should not necessarily be replaced but “significantly changed" because it does not address problems with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Will these new arguments against housing be an issue for Pennsylvania voters?

Team Christie and Corbett

October 15, 2010

Peter Jackson

http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/state/pennsylvania/20101011_ap_njgovchristietoutsgopscorbettinparace.html

Team Christie – Corbett

          
             A new development in the Pennsylvania 2010 Governor Election has occurred now that Chris Christie and Tom Corbett have been spending more and more time together. Will this new found partnership, effect the already existing idea of Corbett's voters? Is there any benefit for Christie by this "friendship"? Also what does this partnership/friendship mean in terms of beliefs and policies in Corbett's campaign?
            New Jersey governor, Christie told the people Pennsylvania the importance Corbett would have if he were in fact voted to be Pennsylvania’s governor.  Christie said that him and Corbett will, “join forces” and make many changes that will be beneficial to Pennsylvanians. 

            Government spending seems to be the main focus from Christie promotion of Corbett.  As a team they believe that by reducing government spending many more jobs will open up. Corbett in addition stated that cultural changes will be made as a result of the easily recognizable “desperation in the Democratic Party in Pennsylvania.”  Corbett and Christie also have the same attitude toward taxes; Corbett previously wrote a “pledge to increase taxes.”Corbett even said that Christie although many years younger is his political “role model.”

            Corbett and Christie have together emphasized the immense significance that people realize that even though it may seem as though Corbett has a good lead over Democrat Dan Onorato it is not entirely true.

            Will Christie’s presence and found support of Corbett affect the choices Pennsylvania voters make on Election Day, November 2nd?

Accountability is Needed to Address Ailing Economy, Democratic U.S. Senate Candidate Joe Sestak Says

October 4, 2010

Ivey Dejesues

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/10/accountability_is_needed_to_ad.html

Sestak’s Military Mindset

            In the on-going U.S. Senate 2010 Election, Democrat Joe Sestak has expressed his idea to solve economic problems. His approach is said to be “…military principal of accountability.” If Sestak does indeed become senator will his military history be applied to all that he does? Will Sestak in the future, address all the concerns from the stimulus bill? 

            Sestak has remained firm in ideas important to him from the start of his campaign. He restates that he wants to “…to create jobs by focusing on small businesses and extending tax cuts to the middle class, rather than the wealthiest…”

Sestak says he will accomplish this by negotiating with a military mindset from both Democrats and Republicans.  He believes the government should have leaders that are military-like and therefore obtain their values. Sestak spoke of being in favor of the “pay as you go” policy and in regards to reducing the U.S. federal deficit. Sestak also addressed other topics like reduces spending on Medicare and Medicaid and increasing government revenue. He speaks about the unfairness of tax cuts given to the wealthy, the importance of small business, bad choices made in Iraq and Afghanistan for involvement of military, and some aspects of the stimulus but avoids topics of private market programs. 

            Sestak was very critical towards the Obama administrations, saying that the president has not kept the public well-informed. Sestak also stressed that Obama should appeal to the people with “Accountability.” He reiterated his military mindset again by stating, in regards to President Obama and the war, “Every strategy must have a (system) to measure if benefits are better that the cost.”

            In this article it seems as though the author, Ivey Dejesus, believes that Sestak is at time too critical on topics like the Obama administration but for the most part the author just expresses the simple facts of Sestak’s words. Although these issues have been repeated numerous times before they are still important for voters to considered when they cast their vote on election day. 

Not on ballot, but a top political drama: Ed Rendell

October 5, 2010

Tom Infield and Angela Couloumbis

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/state/20101005_Not_on_ballot__but_atop_political_drama__Ed_Rendell.html

Onorato Stuck in Rendell's Shadow

Ed Rendell’s appearance during the PA governor election campaign ironically is placing democrat candidate, Dan Onorato in a bad light. Will Rendell come to the realization that by getting involved he is hurting Onorato in the election? 

Recently Onorato’s opponent, Republican Tom Corbett, has been attacking Rendell and his administration; supporting TV ads that accuse Rendell of wasteful spending, raising taxes, and doing nothing about job loss.  Obviously, irritated by the allegations Rendell said, "Tom Corbett should start trying to run against Dan Onorato, not against me" at a conference in Harrisburg. In the ads examples of wasteful spending mentioned “$40,000 to move a statue from the governor's residence; $45 million to renovate Capitol offices; and $10 million for a new library on the campus of Philadelphia University named after U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter” but Onorato challenges Corbett’s accusations saying that the $4 million for the library was appropriate.  

            But this did not bother Corbett, on the contrary Corbett that thought the governor’s complaints gave him advantage. Corbett believes that Rendell is only drawing attention to himself and is not letting Onorato make “his own identity before Election Day.” Voters will be too focused on Rendell’s flaws in government to realize that Onorato is a different person and will not necessary make the same mistakes as Rendell. 

Although Rendell is still quite popular among his home town of Philadelphia, getting a 52% approval rating, it is not the same story in other regions of Pennsylvania.  For the same poll conducted by Franklin and Marshall his approval rating was “23% in central Pa, 26% in the southwest, 29% in the northwest, and 30% in the northeast.”

            Corbett is milking this tactic by attacking Rendell from many angles and sources.  For yet again ad Corbett says that, “Onorato loves raising taxes. . . . Onorato is now joined with Rendell in calling for a massive Pennsylvania energy tax that will kill jobs and drive up utility bills" but this is not the whole truth.  It is true that Onorato thinks that applying natural gas drilling tax is a good idea, but he does not agree that the tax revenue should put be into the state’s general budget but rather want to use it only on “environmental protection.”  Corbett also talks about a tax targeting county families and how it is the “largest tax increase in history.” This statement is again a fact obscured, because Onorato did apply a tax but it was on alcoholic drinks and that it would affect “county families only if they drank in bars.” 

            Even though it may seem as though Rendell’s presence is only harming Onorato’s campaign, Rendell has actually been beneficial.  Rendell has increase Onorato’s campaign by hundreds of thousands of dollars.  And Rendell’s term as governor is not over so he is still trying to cross out many tasks on his to-do list “in a few months’ time.”

            Even so, Rendell’s involvement in Onorato’s campaign is more heavily outweighed by negatives reactions, than positive.  Therefore I believe Rendell place in Onorato’s campaign should be minimal. 

Toomey and Sestak Play Up Military Support

October 1, 2010

Thomas Fitzgerald

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/20101001_Toomey_and_Sestak_play_up_military_support.html

Military Support: Toomey vs. Sestak

            Both Joe Sestak and Pat Toomey strive to get support from voters by increases their military support.  Will this  support by found appealing to voters? And what does such support entail from both senate candidates, Toomey and Sestak?

            Toomey gave one million military veterans center stage when he acknowledged a former secretary of the Navy. This started a door-to-door drive of veterans for Toomey’s opponent, Sestak. Sestak, himself, was a Navy man and achieved the rank of vice admiral.  While on the contrary, Toomey’s career background is centered around Wall Street.  One man who disagrees with Sestak is none other than, John F. Lehman, who was a member of 9/11 commission.  Lehman speaks negatively of Sestak because Sestak supports terrorist suspects receiving a trail in civilian court.  “Sestak also opposed the war in Iraq.”  Although Sestak pays tribute to Lehman for his service, it’s still not surprising that a person familiar to Wall Street would support Toomey because of his own Wall Street experience.

            Many surveys show Toomey with a lead, such as the survey held by Toomey at 45% and Sestak at 42%.  An extreme comparison, pictures Toomey on a flyer next to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.  Democrats say that Republicans refusal to accept their clean-energy legislation is why America is depended on oil from the Middle East.  Toomey also supports the expansion “of oil drilling and tax breaks for the industry.” A TV ad run by Toomey attacks Sestak for his radical position on issues like “voting for bail outs, debt, government health care and job-killing energy taxes.”  Toomey believes that the only reason Lehman would have supported him, if he were advocate of the military and veterans.

            Both candidates are trying to gain voters by being supportive of the military and veterans.  Although it seems as though, at least according to Fitzgerald's words, Toomey is the popular candidate, getting a good amount of support greater than Sestak.

As Pa. gubernatorial race heats up, negative ads begin

Friday Oct. 1, 2010
by Tom Infield
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/20101001_As_Pa__gubernatorial_race_heats_up__negative_ads_begin.html

Negative Commercials

On Wednesday September 29 the Pa governor race arrived at attack mode. The public could see this attack as they watch their regular scheduled programming.

            Not uncommon for candidates, Democrate Dan Onorado released some campaign commercials highlighting the bad qualities of his opponent, Tom Corbett. The commercials accused Corbett of being a “budget-buster, property tax raiser, and a fleet-car abuser.” Onorato’s commercial also said that Corbett “insulted laid-off workers.”

Political science teacher, Christopher Borick, believes that from it is the start of plethora commercials. Each bashing their opposing candidates. He said that if more ads didn’t show up it would be a shock.

Although the Corbett campaign avoided answering questions about when their counter ads would commercials, campaign aides have had commercials ready to go from weeks ago. Corbett says that Onorato’s commercials are just there to “distract and mislead” votes with “unsubstantiated, mis-sourced attacks.”

As an attempt to pick out the good in the commercials Corbett that he “requested budget increases every year” since 2004. Even thought this may be true these increases were partly supported because it would get an increase in salary and benefits for state workers, but not by Corbett, by Governor Rendell.

Some statements on the commercials are not entirely non-bias. For instance the ad says Corbett “raised property taxes by 20%,” although votes wont consider that Corbett dentirely980 when he was a commissioner of a township. Now Corbett has no control over the tax policy because he is attorney general. Onorato also attacked Corbett on his plan to save money by cutting state car fleet. But Rendell called Corbett a hypocrite since the car fleet in the Attorney General’s office was “proportionally larger than most state department.” Corbett’s rebuttal to that accusation was that fight gun crime in Philadelphia. Corbett asked if Onorato was saying he (Corbett) was opposed to fighting gun crime. Onorato always uses to his advantage the time when Corbett “noticed many help-wanted ads… and said he suspected that some workers would rather collect benefits than aggressively look for a job. “Pa GOP leader saying that Corbett was wrong for saying such a foolish thing amended this statement.

I believe that Infield does feel like Corbett is doing a better job. Commercials after now will targeted to attack candidates at all angles. Commercials should be relied on, for this very reason. Candidates views are mostly only half true and twisted so that they appear in a negative light. Even so, many people have such aids in mind when making their choice of candidate. I believe such commercials will have as much effect on the campaign as much as any other campaign, although it is just the beginning. 

In Pa. governor's race, candidates run from being seen as an 'insider'

September 23, 2010
Tom Infield
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/20100909_In_Pa__governor_s_race__candidates_run_from_being_seen_as_an__insider_.html

Both Pa Governor Candidate Want to be "Outside" Candiates

It seems as though the ultimate goal of th major candidates (Dan Onorate and Tom Corbett) of the Fall Governor election is to be seen as an "Outsider." Although this raises the question, that if by appearing like an outsider does it conclude that the candidates are inexperienced?

For Onorato’s campaign on being an outsider, he spoke about how he was not involved with Harrisburg because he never had a job in Harrisburg. At fourty-nine years old Onorato has “been in elected office for eighteen consecutive years.” He was Allegheny Country controller before becoming the Allegheny County executive in 2003. Also Onorato was a city council member in Pittsburgh. BY not having “Ties” with Harrisburg Onorato claims that, “It’s easier for me to change it Harrisburg.

Jim Hoefler is a political science professor at Dickinson College who was convinced by Onorato’s outsider claims.  Hoefler believes that since Onorato is in charge of Pittsburgh, he is not involved with the activities in Harrisburg. There, “He can’t be blamed, he can’t take credit” In order to make it seem like Corbett was inexperienced a “…Onorato news release blasted Corbett in somewhat self-contradictory terms.” And he called Corbett “an insider who doesn’t have the experience…. to lead Pennsylvania.”

Candidate Tom Corbett also wanted to b e thought as an outsider. He said that sixty-one his life in politics is dated all the way back to 1980s. In 1988, Corbett coordinated the presidential campaign for George H.W. Bush, and became U.S. attorney of Western Pennsylvavnia afterword. Corbett says because he has never had a legislative or executive branch position he is a “true outside.” He says he is a mere “Watchdog on public corruption.”

Gerald R.Shuster, another professor, this one from the University of Pittsburgh, has been persuaded by Corbett's outsider claims. He says that since Corbett. “… the attorney general, [voters] don’t perceive that as being in politics.” Shuster also defends Corbett by about how Onorato is not so much of an outsider to Harrisburg as he claims he is. Shuster said that Onorato helped with Allegheny County to impose a tax on drinks poured in bars.” Therefore to accomplish this, Onorato would have had to be quite involved in Harrisburg. Also, Corbett didn’t want to seem too inexperienced so he aired a TV commercial which basically stated his credential and such pertaining to being a prosecutor.

When it comes down to it, it is more likely that the candidate seems like “… a sort of outsider –insider…” rather than not appearing like insider.

"Obama stumps for Sestak"

September 23, 2010
Chris Brennan
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/pennsylvania/20100921_Obama_stumps_for_Sestak.html

Obama supports Sestak

How will Obama's support of Sestak affect the Senate Election? Will Sestak meet expectations, now that the President Obama has publicly acknowledged that he backs up his fellow Democrat?
Although he wasn’t necessarily on Joe Sestak’s side during last year’s Democratic primary race for U.S. Senate, President Obama has now changed his views and came to support Sestak’s campaign.  Obama asked that the Democrats show as much zeal for Sestak as they did for him in the 2008 election.  As Sestak reminded his supporters of his commitment to his party, Obama defended him by saying, “the two-term congressman is not one of the Capitol “insiders” causing problems in Washington”.  In Harrisburg, Pat Toomey tried to diminish Sestak’s major supporter, saying that the only thing the fundraiser would do is “remind voters that Sestak has been “lockstep” with Obama’s legislative agenda”.

Even so, past examples has shown Sestak to be a very strong-willed candidate.  In the past, many people of power have offered him bribes in order for him to drop out of campaigns.  Rupublican Party state chairman, Rob Gleason, informed reporters that Sestak was bribed by the former President Bill Clinton to “drop a challenge to U.S. Senator Arlen Spector.  Sestak was promised a place on a “… senior executive branch advisory board”, but Sestak refused and won the over Spector in May.

Many voters may say that they know for sure whom they are voting for, but with this new found support from the current President of the U.S., Barack Obama, will Sestak have an edge? I believe this is a two sided question. Obama has popularity and therefore just having the name "Democrat" will boost Sestak's votes, although Obama's recent push for the stimulus plan has upset many voters.So, Obama's support could in essence have both a negative and positive effect on Sestak's campaign.

Election 2010: Pennsylvania Senate

Sptember 17, 2010

Rasmussen Writer

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/pennsylvania/2010_senate_election/election_2010_pennsylvania_senate

Election 2010: Pennsylvania Senate

            Even though it is early in the election, can an accurate prediction be made for the Senate Race? And what do the people think of Toomey and Sestak so far?

            Many surveys make up the prediction of the 2010 Fall Senate Election. As of now 49% is for Pat Toomey, 41% for Joe Sestak, 2% for another candidate, and 8% are still undecided.  Toomey's voters, 69% of them made up their choice from the November and 74% of them said the same for Sestak. In February Toomey support was from 42% to 48% but Sestak support was declining and was now from 36% to 42%.  On September 13 the 500 Likeyly Voters in Pennsylvania survey was held and their results were that 96% of people were confident in their candidate decision.

            The Rasmussen’s article only provides data for the voter.  There is no, and cannot be any, opinion in surveys. Interrupting what they represent can be somewhat opinionated but numbers are absolute. Therefore as of now, the support for either major candidate for the Senate Race is neck to neck.

"...Major Shift in the Education Debate..."

September 16, 2010

Tom Infield

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/state/20100915_Pennsylvania_gubernatorial_candidates_advocate_school-vouchers_bill_at_forum.html

Pa  Gubernatorial Candidates and School-vouchers Bill

    In contrast to the last governor election, held in 2006, this year's election has school choice as an issue. Does this mean that Onorato is indecisive? And which campaign will PAC support and therefor, donate to?
    The article by Infield is centered around the issue of the school-vouchers bill.  Although they are opposing candidates, Onorato and Corbett both are in support of this bill.  The school- voucher bill "... would permit low-income students in failing public schools to obtain vouchers they could use for attendance at another public school or private school." According to both Onorato and Corbett, by passing this bill many parents would have the option to send thier children to a private school or another high school. Both candidates also demonstrated importance for the state's Educational Employment Tax Credit program and charter schools.
 While Corbett was very confident on his position, Onorato avoided even saying the word vouchers.  Corbett says that the bill is "the cicil rights issue of the 21st century."  Trying to defend his choice, Onorato tells the forum that his own children attends Catholic school and that the issue involves many aspects which he advocates: "greater funding for schools, especially early-childhood education."
At the forum the candidates each had a turn to speak but never spoke at the same time.  Reason most likely being the candidates first real debate is in Harrisburg on September 27.  A questioner stated that Onorato "has the endorsement of the state's major teacher's union" and asked if that would hurt his chances of getting opportunity grants.  Corbett said he would make state level charter schools but it would not seize the local school directors power to watch over the charter schools.  
During the last fall election businessman, Bala Cynwd and the group PAC donated a significant amount of money to Anthony Williams and drew much public critique. They said they were not sure if they would yet again donate but Williams said, "I hope so. I really do."  Being that both candidates are in agreement, voters will have a tough decision of whom will be the better governor.