Onorato, Corbett go toe to toe on TV

October 26, 2010

Kari Andren

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/10/onorato_corbett_go_toe_to_toe.html

Have Onorato and Corbett Gone Soft?

The Gubernatorial Race Democratic Dan Onorato and Tom Corbett make it appear as though they are playing “nice” while campaigning compared to the Senate Race. Does this mean a clearer judgment of the better governor candidates can be determined among the voters?

 This in no means indicates that Onorato and Corbett haven’t tried to put a negative light on each other.  On the contrary, both candidates have each spent hundreds of thousands of their campaign funding on TV commercials and aids.  For Corbett, paying double the amount of paid-off because afterward Corbett led over Onorato.  Although Onorato attacked “…across-the-board budget cuts…” proposed by Corbett, saying it would significantly hurt senior citizens.  And yet again Corbett ran an aid using Onorato’s words to damage Onorato’s creditability when it came to job increase in Allegheny.

            More time than none the aid run by candidate have little truth in them.  Commercials, used to diminish the opponents judgment or character, consists of quotes and policies obscured and twisted to present themselves, the candidate as a positive figure, being the “good guy.”  I believe that for the most part voters should not base their candidate decisions upon aids and commercials. These are not reliable sources. Voters should research on the candidate’s policies and tune into debates to get a better idea of whom they should, in fact, vote for. 

PA 2010 Mid-Term Election Breakdown: Dan Onorato, Tom Corbett, Pat Toomey, and Joe Sestak

October 27, 2010

Sean OBrien

http://www.philly2philly.com/politics_community/politics_community_articles/2010/10/27/45410/pa_2010_mid_term_election_breakdown_

Onorato vs. Corbett & Sestak vs. Toomey on Hot Tpoics

            Now that Pa Election Day is not far away at all, there are some pretty good prospects of where the major candidates from both the Governor and Senator. By now does the public, a.k.a. the voters, know how enough about the candidates make a well thought about choice? Who will is for the time-being most likely prevail and win the election?

            From the Gubernatorial Race, Dan Onorato is representing the Democratic Party while the Republicans are represented by Tom Corbett.  Onorato had a seat on City Council in Pittsburgh, and later became controller of Allegheny. He is now currently Executive of Allegheny.  Corbett has been Allegheny’s Assistant District Attorney, Shaler Township’s Commissioner, and Western Pa’s U.S. Attorney. Currently he is now Attorney General of Pa.

            During public debates topics like gun control regulations, taxes and funding were hot topics.  Onorato’s stance on these issues is gun control is regulations should be in place and that stat’s such as Florida should not be excused for the regulation, lower corporate income tax, decrease Pa legislature, and to cuts on school funding.  Also related to schooling, Onorato believes that awarding grants to low income student so that they can attend their choice of school is a good future idea. Corbett on the other hand, has established a gun violence task force, also wants taxes lowered, favors government and small business interaction, intends to down right, “…cut the legislative per diem…”, wants s decrease of fleet vehicles from the government along with money towards a children’s school of choice.  Both candidates strongly support the Early Childhood education and school tax credit program. Both Onorato and Corbett acknowledge the growth potential and environmental concerns of the Marcellus Shale rock formation but each have a different approach for its funding. 

            In the Senate Race, the major candidates are Democrat Joe Sestak and Republican Pat Tommey.  While in the Navy Sestak was Vice Admiral, U.S. Director of Defense, and Navy Director and afterward was elected into the 7^th District’s House of Representatives. Toomey was Government Study Commission for Allentown, and then he was also elected into the 15^th District’s House of Representatives.

            For the Senate debates touches on a variety of different issues. Sestak said that there was an excessive of cuts made in the Pentagon, he is against nuclear weapons in Iran, increase troops in Afghanistan, he favors like many the Early Childhood education, and he wants to change Social Security to ensure its future.  Toomey doesn’t agree on the end of the war in Afghanistan, “…privatizing Social Security…”, and abortion supported by taxpayers.

            Sean Obrien, the author of the article, seems to just be very straight forward and factual with his statements.  There is no display of his support of one candidate over another. These facts are useful for voters to establish a basic outline of the important topics and issues of where each major candidates, from both the Gubernatorial Face and the Senate Race, stands.

Joe Sestak Making Play For Second Turn As Comeback Kid

October 19, 2010
Sam Stein
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/19/joe-sestak-comeback_n_768051.html

Is Joe Sestak the new comeback kid?

            It has been rumored that democrat Joe Sestak will make a significant comeback in the pa senate fall election.
            Sestak leads 46% to 45% for the first time in the poll from PPP and the ABC News odd makers now say that the race went from "lean republican to toss up". A new found hope was given to the Democratic Party and also felt that a repetition of Senator Arlen Spector come back might just happen for Sestak. Although Sestak is more stable in the campaign financially than republican opponent pat Toomey, the debate issues have been the same. Now Sestak has started to point out Toomey's faults more pronouncedly that it has affected Sestak's campaign in a positive way.

U.S. Senate candidates Pat Toomey and Joe Sestak exchange attacks

October 15, 2010
Ivey Dejesus
http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/10/us_senate_candidates_pat_toome.html

Crunch Time Means Attack Mode

      As the Fall Senate Election quickly approaches it is crunch time for candidates, Republican Pat Toomey and Democrat Joe Sestak. Both Toomey and Sestak had used this time to cleverly attack the others campaign to score some last minute or swing voters. The senate candidates are both aggressive and are focusing on "economic and tax policies and congressional records" to put the other in a bad light. Will their attempts prove to be effective?  What will voters think of the candidates once they see that Toomey and Sestak have gone far and beyond to attack one another?
With a debate on Wednesday in Philly and one on Friday in Pittsburgh it seems as though Sestak had a pretty confident lead. This however is not entirely true according to recent polls which display more or close lead. Toomey although has a 10% lead with likely voters, reported by Rasmussen.
       Voters got a view of both candidates attended a conference call to a group of workers. Sestak tried to reach out to working people, while meeting with small companies like Hydroworx. Sestak tries to establish the idea to "change the focus of Washington... in favor of small business and jobs." Sestak also spoke about job loss and his future ideas to improve the situation. He rectifies his support of stimulus bill, Criticized by Toomey, by saying it supposed to be a "a slow hemorrhaging of jobs bill." Sestak took a risky move and pointed out that his own party didn’t support all of his proposals to display his determination “to be an independent reprehensive of pa working families. He attacked Toomey by saying "Toomey's economic and foreign trade policies" is supporting job outsourcing which will led to loss of jobs especially in pa. Sestak also criticized Toomey on his support of trade policies in china. Toomey then talked about campaign finance regulations. Both candidates where then asked their views on the " don’t ask, don’t tell policy" which restricts homosexuals from openly serving. Both candidates said they would repeal the policy; Toomey is very open to it and Sestak is disappointed repeal hasn’t occurred sooner already.
      Both candidates used political attacks instead of resorting to personal attacks which helps make more creditable campaign. Sestak seems to relate to matters that everyday people would understand and be attentive to. Toomey even though talked about political issues it would help to speak about topics the everyday voters would care significantly for. I believe that this conference call benefited Sestak more than Toomey.

Toomey, Sestak trade jabs on housing

October 15. 2010

Chris Brennan

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/pennsylvania/20101014_Toomey_rips_Sestak_on_housing.html

Sestak and Toomey Pointing the Finger

            It is a game of placing the blame in the Pennsylvania 2010 Senate Election. Both Pat Toomey and Joe Sestak are passing the blame on each other for the housing collapse resulting in the downfall of national economy. Will this be the beginning to an ugly campaign and debate? Can both Toomey and Sestak hold their composure after an attack by their opponent?

Realizing its crunch time until general election on November 2^nd Toomey has come to campaign on Philadelphia.  His speech mainly focused on putting down Frannie and Freddie Mac and Sestak saying that it is their fault for the housing problem.  Frannie and Freddie Mac are two "government-sponsored enterprises… with the mission to increase the amount of money banks can lend to homebuyers” who was supposed to be a solution to reduce financial spenders.  Toomey think ending relations with these agencies and conducting a study of in fact how they potentially affect the economy and banks.  Toomey also blamed Sestak for being a sell-out to taxpayer who had a “liberal agenda” in mind.

Sestak responded to Toomey’s statement and accusations by indicating Toomey’s agreement of a legislation in support of the agencies Frannie and Freddie Mac.  Sestak also pointed out that fact that Toomey had not make up his mind on the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act which would prevent new economic trouble from mortgages.  Sestak’s spokesman’s talked about how Toomey only points the finger, never examining his own faults and short coming or realizing his dependence on Wall Street.

Toomey’s response was that the act should not necessarily be replaced but “significantly changed" because it does not address problems with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Will these new arguments against housing be an issue for Pennsylvania voters?

Team Christie and Corbett

October 15, 2010

Peter Jackson

http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/state/pennsylvania/20101011_ap_njgovchristietoutsgopscorbettinparace.html

Team Christie – Corbett

          
             A new development in the Pennsylvania 2010 Governor Election has occurred now that Chris Christie and Tom Corbett have been spending more and more time together. Will this new found partnership, effect the already existing idea of Corbett's voters? Is there any benefit for Christie by this "friendship"? Also what does this partnership/friendship mean in terms of beliefs and policies in Corbett's campaign?
            New Jersey governor, Christie told the people Pennsylvania the importance Corbett would have if he were in fact voted to be Pennsylvania’s governor.  Christie said that him and Corbett will, “join forces” and make many changes that will be beneficial to Pennsylvanians. 

            Government spending seems to be the main focus from Christie promotion of Corbett.  As a team they believe that by reducing government spending many more jobs will open up. Corbett in addition stated that cultural changes will be made as a result of the easily recognizable “desperation in the Democratic Party in Pennsylvania.”  Corbett and Christie also have the same attitude toward taxes; Corbett previously wrote a “pledge to increase taxes.”Corbett even said that Christie although many years younger is his political “role model.”

            Corbett and Christie have together emphasized the immense significance that people realize that even though it may seem as though Corbett has a good lead over Democrat Dan Onorato it is not entirely true.

            Will Christie’s presence and found support of Corbett affect the choices Pennsylvania voters make on Election Day, November 2nd?

Accountability is Needed to Address Ailing Economy, Democratic U.S. Senate Candidate Joe Sestak Says

October 4, 2010

Ivey Dejesues

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/10/accountability_is_needed_to_ad.html

Sestak’s Military Mindset

            In the on-going U.S. Senate 2010 Election, Democrat Joe Sestak has expressed his idea to solve economic problems. His approach is said to be “…military principal of accountability.” If Sestak does indeed become senator will his military history be applied to all that he does? Will Sestak in the future, address all the concerns from the stimulus bill? 

            Sestak has remained firm in ideas important to him from the start of his campaign. He restates that he wants to “…to create jobs by focusing on small businesses and extending tax cuts to the middle class, rather than the wealthiest…”

Sestak says he will accomplish this by negotiating with a military mindset from both Democrats and Republicans.  He believes the government should have leaders that are military-like and therefore obtain their values. Sestak spoke of being in favor of the “pay as you go” policy and in regards to reducing the U.S. federal deficit. Sestak also addressed other topics like reduces spending on Medicare and Medicaid and increasing government revenue. He speaks about the unfairness of tax cuts given to the wealthy, the importance of small business, bad choices made in Iraq and Afghanistan for involvement of military, and some aspects of the stimulus but avoids topics of private market programs. 

            Sestak was very critical towards the Obama administrations, saying that the president has not kept the public well-informed. Sestak also stressed that Obama should appeal to the people with “Accountability.” He reiterated his military mindset again by stating, in regards to President Obama and the war, “Every strategy must have a (system) to measure if benefits are better that the cost.”

            In this article it seems as though the author, Ivey Dejesus, believes that Sestak is at time too critical on topics like the Obama administration but for the most part the author just expresses the simple facts of Sestak’s words. Although these issues have been repeated numerous times before they are still important for voters to considered when they cast their vote on election day.